| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
Slayer_Allen
Incredibly Wordy Bastard
2081 Posts |
Posted - 10/05/2003 : 23:52:11
|
Because I suddenly find myself harboring dislike for you, I thought I would do for you some math it seems you have overlooked.
First, I have about 1130 posts, fair enough. I have been registered with the boards for a little over 11 months.
So, 1130/11 = around 102. So 102 posts per month. Yes, this seems like a lot.
Now, you have about 432 posts. Not nearly so many at all. YOU have been registered with the boards for a little under three months. So, 432/3 = 141. Yes, thats right, 141 posts per month.
But wait! Thats 39 more posts per month than me, on average. How is this? Aren't you the one doing at least half the complaining about me posting habits? You, who posts at least 40% more than I do?
Ok, you say all my posts are spam. I beg to differ, but I'll ignore that for now. Let's look at YOUR record. Hrmm, lets take two out of a very recent thread, neither of which have ANYTHING to do with the topic.
quote: Can we change his title from "Incredibly Wordy Bastard" To "Incredibly annoying spamming bastard who needs to not spam all the time"
and
quote: Ahhh very good aggie, I like yours more.
There are so many possibilities, why dont you just delete his account forcing him to create another, thus resulting in his pride being destroyed and he can no longer chase Pisn for the top post-er, because after all, we all know thats what he is truly chasing.
I probably havn't seen more than 10 posts by Slayer that are actually relevant to the topic, or if they are relevant to the topic, that actually contribute anything constructive to the topic.
I know many of us, not only me, are tired of seeing slayer spamming abilities. It was mentioned by someone that when they see slayers name on as a new post in a thread, they don't even bother to read what he said, because they (we) know it will just be, well, spam.
Well look at that, not only are those both off topic spam, but I was greatly insulted by the second. Then not only are they spam, but they are also flames? But wait, Mistress "I follow the rules everywhere's and impose my will upon others" couldn't have broken:
quote: 1. Personal attacks of any kind are not allowed. Even when said in jest, it's hard for the Moderators and readers to tell when an insult was meant to hurt or meant to laugh. Therefore, just don't do it - they'll be deleted.
I was hurt. As much as I could be anyway, given the superficial sort of way that lends itself to the nature and location of the one doing the hurting, and our relationship.
My point is you are an annoying hypocrite and I think you should stfu & stfd.
That is all the flame I am going to allow myself in this otherwise entirely mature and logical post. I still don't know how the moderators of the board will take my posting on this issue, but I took pains not to write several of the things that came to mind on my initial reading of your post awhile ago. It was probably a good thing that the thread was locked and I could not defend myself.
I will admit I am sometimes in violation of rules 6,7. But not nearly so much as you make out, and, well, wtf, so are you.
Thanks you, that is all.
<Yes, there is no /rant or "step off of soap box" attempt at humor, because I do not find this humorous>
--------------- Just because I play CPA doesn't mean I suck. That is a seperate occurance. |
|
|
UnderOath
Wordy Bastard
838 Posts |
Posted - 10/06/2003 : 00:48:44
|
I applaud you on the contructive and informative post, and unlike others, this one was on topic (basically because you created the thread), but there are a few things I would like to point out before this thread is closed and deleted.
The reason I have such a high posting rate is because I do make quite a few posts, but they are usually in response to something directly concerning, i.e. a comment made to or about me, a question directed to or about me, or a concern and/or opinion one may have that I can contribute my opinion or knowledge to.
And to clerify, those comments were in response to Pisn's comment which was refering to you bs post(s). And notice "posts" was plural making reference to not one, but numerous posts containing "bs".
The reason I also had every right to comment was because there has been discussion about your overwhelming tendancy to spam on almost every thread there is, and how it has gottong to the point where we don't read the forums when we notice that your name is the most recent poster.
When I am not the only person who holds this opinion of you, and it has been discussed a few times, I have every right to state my opinion, as well the opinions of others.
 |
 |
|
|
ListerD
Administrator
1205 Posts |
Posted - 10/06/2003 : 08:43:54
|
End of discussion.
End this or I will close both accounts.
 |
 |
|
| |
Topic  |
|
|
|